Community Advocacy on Environmental and Social Justice

Friday, 2 November 2012

LAMU JUBA PORT PROJECT


LAMU:A fledgling project to build a huge new 
port, oil refinery and transport hub on Kenya's northern coastline 
promises to deliver thousands of jobs and is a pillar of the 
government's long-term development agenda. But critics fear the 
project will displace tens of thousands of people in Lamu District, 
exacerbate decades of marginalization, degrade marine environments 
essential to local livelihoods and increase the risk of conflict as 
the country gears up for elections in March 2013. 

"This project will displace many people from their homes. yet the 
government is not very clear on what plans they have for those who 
will be displaced," Abubakar-Al Amudi, chairperson of Save Lamu, a 
coalition of organizations dedicated to saving the Lamu Archipelago 
from environmental destruction, told IRIN. 

The Ministry of Lands says some 60,000 people will be displaced by the 
project. With just a few months remaining until the country's 
presidential elections, human rights activists say the issue of land 
could be used by politicians to stoke violence. 

"The issue of land in Lamu must be used handled with care because the 
coming elections might give politicians the impetus to use it to 
instigate violence," Hussein Khalid, the executive director of the NGO 
Muslims for Human Rights, told IRIN. 

Kenya has experienced politically instigated violence every election 
year since the introduction of multi-party democracy in 1992, causing 
the deaths of thousands the displacement of many more. 

"Land ownership has been used by politicians every election year to 
incite communities against each other, all aimed at getting political 
support and to exclude those they think might not support them," 
Khalid said. 

Land rights 

The coast region has long grappled with unresolved land issues. After 
the country gained independence from Britain in 1963, the government 
appropriated large swaths of land and distributed plots, often 
according to a corrupt system of political patronage. Many residents 
ended up as "squatters" on land they considered their birthright. 

Currently, less than 20 percent of residents at the coast, including 
Lamu, have titles for the land they live on. The Mombasa Republican 
Council, which is calling for the secession of the coastal region, is 
using land rights as a rallying cry [ 
http://www.irinnews.org/Report/96630/Briefing-Kenya-s-coastal-separatists-menace-or-martyrs 
]. 

The region erupted over these issues earlier this year, when two 
communities, the Orma and the Pokomo, fought over land. The violence 
left 118 people dead and thousands displaced, and is believed to have 
been politically instigated. 

But the secrecy with which the government is carrying out the Lamu 
project is only aggravating the sense of marginalization and exclusion 
among coastal residents. 

"It is a government obligation to ensure that people are [sensitized 
on the] Lamu port project to make them feel they are part of it. As it 
is now, they feel excluded because nobody is telling them how the 
project will benefit them. If anything, sentiments from locals suggest 
it is all about how the project will not help them," said Auma Osolo, 
a political scientist at Masinde Muliro University. 

"Leaving people who have been living on the land without any adequate 
compensation is to perpetuate the marginalization of the coastal 
people that they have suffered over the years," said Khalid of Muslims 
for Human Rights. 

Compensation 

The government says there are compensation plans for those who will be 
displaced, but residents are sceptical. 

"We have no title deeds, and the government has not given us any or 
told us they will give it. How will they compensate us? We don't 
believe it," Moussa Salim, a Bajuni elder, told IRIN. 

Government officials told IRIN that the demarcation of the land, the 
first step required before title deeds can be issued, had begun. This 
will help determine who will be compensated. 

"Once we are done with the demarcation, we will duly compensate people 
who have been affected, but it is not easy to say how soon," Dorothy 
Angote, permanent secretary in the Ministry of Lands, said. 

IRIN did not, however, find any evidence of land demarcation during a 
visit there, and residents said they were not aware of any such 
exercise. 

In line with the constitution, the government has enacted three land 
laws - the Land Act 2012 [ 
http://www.kenyalaw.org/klr/fileadmin/pdfdownloads/Acts/Land_Act___No_6_of_2012___1_.pdf 
], the Land Registration Act and the Land Commission Act - expected to 
help manage the administration of land. The land commission, yet to 
come into place, by the law must help right historical land problems. 

Legal experts say any land issues carried out without the input of the 
commission would be illegal. 

Disrupting livelihoods 

The project involves dredging shallow inland channels and felling 
shoreline-stabilizing mangrove forests. Experts say the process could 
disrupt artisanal fishing, the main source of income for around 70 
percent of Lamu's 100,000 people, and destroy the environment, 
especially the mangrove plantations. 

Fishing and tourism together provide a source of livelihood to 90 
percent of Lamu's population, according to the ministry of planning. 

"The project will destroy shallow waters and mangroves, a key habitat 
for fish, and many poor locals will lose their only source of 
livelihood," Alfredo Quarto, director of the NGO Mangrove Action 
Project, told IRIN. 

Recently started, the process is already having an effect. Aboud 
Swaleh, a 45-year-old artisanal fisherman said, "There are areas we 
can't get fish because there is no water. We can't feed our families 
as we used to." 

"Ensuring that infrastructural development does not disrupt people's 
livelihoods should be the priority for the government," Garrett Monda, 
environmentalist and lecturer at the University of Nairobi, told IRIN. 

"When you have a project that will displace over 60,000 people without 
a clear plan on how you want to resettle them, it is a recipe for 
chaos," he added. 

A feasibility study [ 
http://www.savelamu.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Lapsset-Executive-Summary.pdf 
] commissioned by the government recommended, among other things, a 
comprehensive environmental impact assessment. The government did put 
out an advertisement calling on firms to bid to conduct the impact 
assessment, but it has yet to be awarded. 

ko/rz 

[END] 

This report online: http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportID=96675 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Hi Eroo !! Whats your Views on this ?